Six
Sigma is a highly disciplined process that focuses on developing and delivering
near-perfect products and services. Sigma is a statistical term that measures
how far a given process deviates from perfection. The central idea behind Six
Sigma is that if you can measure how many defects you have in a process, you
can systematically figure out how to eliminate them and get as close to zero
defects as possible. Manufacturing companies around the world are implementing
the Six Sigma process to:
·
Improve
customer satisfaction
·
Maximize
process efficiencies
·
Increase
competitive advantage and market share
·
Save
millions of dollars in operating expenses
Jack
Welch, former CEO of GE, says that Six Sigma is "the most important
initiative GE has ever taken...it is part of the genetic code of our future
leadership."
Many companies
implementing Six Sigma use a process called DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve
and control) for continued improvement. DMAIC is a systematic, scientific and
fact-based process that eliminates unproductive steps. It helps companies
fulfill the vision of Six Sigma.
New
computer-aided inspection (CAI) technologies can drastically improve the
"measure" and "analyze" part of the DMAIC process, making
them valuable tools in the Six Sigma approach to quality.
The Bottleneck
It is well
documented that three-dimensional verification is frequently the slowest, most
expensive and disruptive element of the manufacturing process. Advances in
CAD/CAM/CAE and digital technologies continue to improve other manufacturing
processes, but the dimensional inspection bottleneck has remained intact.
Manufacturing
companies spend a significant percentage of their resources to develop 3D CAD
models that define the design of a part. But, the efficiencies of the 3D CAD
model do not carry over into the verification and inspection processes.
Designers
break the 3D models into 2D drawings and apply constraints to determine product
configuration. Geometric design and tolerance (GD&T) assigned in 2D
drawings are then evaluated in the 3D models, yielding a complex web of
dependencies. Changing and maintaining the 2D drawings requires considerable effort,
and the process contains a great deal of duplication.
Today's
Inspection Process
Most
inspection today is done by contact metrology, the science of physically
determining an object's dimensions. Contact metrology includes everything from
simple manual tools to coordinate measurement machines (CMM).
A CMM system
consists of a platform on which the desired measurement object is fixed. The
station has an arm where a touch probe is attached. The machine makes direct
contact with the object being measured at a rate of approximately one contact
measure per second. CMM systems vary in size depending on the objects they need
to measure. They are slow, large, expensive and susceptible to environmental
temperature variation.
The CAI
Alternative
CAI
aims to remove the bottleneck of dimensioning verification in the manufacturing
process. It is not intended to replace metrology, but rather to introduce a
faster and easier process for directly comparing as-built parts with their 3D
CAD definition.
There are two
widely used non-contact measurement systems for CAI: 3D scanners and laser
trackers. 3D scanners are commonly used for range finding. They work by
projecting a laser beam onto an object and measuring its reflected image with a
positioning sensor. 3D scanners are fast and can be mounted onto an existing
CMM.
White Light
Scanning is also known as interferometry. By knowing the wavelength of the
emitted light and the distance between fringes, the distance between two points
can be computed.
Non-contact
white light measurement systems collect data much faster than CMMs. It is
common to collect tens of thousands of points per second. With massive amounts
of data being transmitted to a computer for processing, software based on
complex mathematics and sophisticated algorithms must be used to interpolate
the data quickly.
The CAI Wish
List
The new wave
of CAI systems combine fast, non-contact measurement machines with software
that aligns, compares, evaluates and reports the deviation between as-built
parts and the 3D CAD reference model. Market research has determined that
customers want the following attributes in a CAI solution:
·
Accuracy
of 0.001mm to 0.005mm
·
Speed
of more than 10,000 points per second
·
Portability
for in-process measurement
·
An
open system for rapid conversion to standard or native CAD formats
·
Automatic
align, compare, evaluate and report process
·
Repeatable
setup, process and results
·
Ease
of use so it can be deployed on the shop floor by inspectors with no CAD
training
·
Go/no-go
displays that enable an automatic pass/fail check with pre-defined tolerances
Fulfilling the
CAI Promise
CAI software
will become a mainstream application and an essential part of the digital
product development cycle. Pushing quality inspection into earlier phases of
the development cycle will speed product development and ensure greater
quality. As supplier networks continue to expand and products are increasingly
differentiated according to quality, how well a company implements the
inspection process can be a make or break factor in the marketplace.
CAI is
beginning the same way as most new technologies. The innovators are relatively
small companies without extensive marketing resources to penetrate deeper into
large manufacturing operations. System integrators and consultants are needed
to customize the new CAI technologies and integrate them into existing digital
manufacturing processes.
CAI can
eliminate the requirement for generating 2D drawings for parts and tools, which
can save hundreds of engineering hours. It places the verification and
inspection process into the 3D digital realm, where it can be fully integrated
into existing CAD/CAM/CAE processes. This will allow manufacturers to reap greater
benefits from their CAD/CAM/CAE investments and bring them closer to the
promise Six Sigma.
The
biggest obstacle to CAI acceptance is the inertia caused by familiar ways of
doing things. Unwillingness to take a risk is always a deterrent to innovation.
But, the difference between CAI and earlier digital processes is that there is
much less risk. CAI technologies complement, rather than replace, the
CAD/CAM/CAE systems manufacturers already have in place. Early adopters of CAI
will get a head start in establishing processes whose benefits will only
multiply with time.
No comments:
Post a Comment